Imagine that a platform for compliance costs $12,000 per year. Is it expensive?
The answer is contingent on what it is replacing.
Automating the collection of evidence across a complex technology environment eliminates hundreds hours of repetitive work, it could be a wise investment. If a company of seven could collect the same information by hand in just a few hours every month, the total will be very different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Do not begin by asking which one has the most features. Ask your business how these features will help you save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing has an Break-Even Point
Compliance automation isn’t inherently good or bad. The value of it changes as you grow. Imagine a technology company that is growing with hundreds of employees, numerous cloud environments, multiple applications, and frequently access changes. The effort of manually capturing evidence over time could become extremely difficult. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence can justly justify the expense.
Now think about a 10-person company that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. It may have a relatively small infrastructure, and gathering of evidence can be handled without a lot of automation.
Vanta pricing is based upon this difference. While an advanced platform could have many features but they only have value only when an organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture And Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly turn into an exercise of feature-by-feature. The two platforms are built upon automation and are integrated companies that are looking to adopt this type of approach will benefit from having a look at the frameworks available along with their integrations and services as well as individual quotations and contracts.
It’s important to choose the other thing first. Does your business have an interest in an integration-driven system for compliance? Some businesses want automated evidence collection and continuous monitoring. Others prefer to present evidence themselves, particularly when the amount of work remains minimal.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Use the Same Model
A number of well-known Vanta rivals have a place in the market, that is centered around automation. There are other platforms that concentrate on organization over the vast system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of this group. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace and provides editable guidance on policy as well as evidence. Auditors have the ability to examine evidence through a restricted interface.
It is deliberately not connected to operational systems or install infrastructure agents. Customers choose and upload the proof they wish to present.
Factor System Access Into the Decision
Removing integrations has an obvious disadvantage: someone must collect evidence by hand.
The application for compliance does not require integration and can be used without having to establish standing connections with the operating environment.
The structures of one are not superior to each other. The key question is what option is most appropriate for your company.
CertAssist is aimed at teams comprising between five and 200 individuals. It also publishes its pricing instead of requiring the salesperson to discuss the initial figure. The launch price is $225 per month, that’s a difference from the normal price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Have Its Place
What a 10-person start-up needs today may not be the same at 100 or even 500 employees.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can make sense. The costs of automation will rise as the number of employees, systems and frameworks grow. It’s better to let complexity of technology for compliance to earn its place.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. It is best to pay for them only when they are necessary and the cost for doing the task manually is higher.